Ceramic On Ceramic Vs Metal On Metal Hip

The metasul group included thirty patients with a mean age of forty.

Ceramic on ceramic vs metal on metal hip.

A comparative study with twelve to fourteen year follow up. A ceramic femoral head and a ceramic lining ceramic on ceramic in addition during june 2011 the fda approved a new ceramic on metal system. A ceramic versus metal femoral head on a polyethylene lin. The world s first ceramic on metal hip implant has been given approval by the fda usa food and drug administration.

Any hip replacement device with either a metal socket or ball will result in metal wear particles in your bloodstream. Thirty nine cementless hip arthroplasties using metal on metal articulation were consecutively implanted in 30 patients less than 50. Ese groups after a minimum duration of follow up of twelve years. Sedel presented an overview of ceramic on ceramic hip bearings and a 20 year study on the coupling at the sicot xxv triennial world congress 2011.

Manufactured by depuy a subsidiary of johnson johnson it s called the pinnacle complete acetabular hip system. Ceramic is one of the best materials that can be used in a hip replacement but when paired with a metal socket it quickly falls to the back of the pack. Metal on metal versus ceramic on polyethylene hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years of age. Thirty nine metal on metal cementless hip replacements with a 28 mm diameter metasul articulation were compared with a control group that included thirty nine cementless ceramic on polyethylene hip replacements performed with a 28 mm diameter head.

Following the massive depuy recall of metal on metal hip implants ceramic hips are fast becoming the implant of choice. The advantages of ceramic on ceramic are great.